When building reports, we see that Custom Fields are identified by their Names, and not by their Labels. Can this be changed?
Reason is - because Custom Field Names are used on document templates, we tend to keep these abbreviated or shorter, so as not to clog up the template with extra long names, whereas the Label is the proper refined name that users know the field by.
If the report can use the Labels rather than the Names, this would help with report readabilty. This would need to be "on-screen" and in exported reports.
Thanks
Nick
0 Votes
1 Comments
N
Nick Ciccocioppoposted
12 months ago
To add to this, it would be nice if the reports could have a header row with all the fields labelled in the actual report (for the on-screen reports), rather than having to look at the pivot fields which end up out of alignment with the report column data.
When building reports, we see that Custom Fields are identified by their Names, and not by their Labels. Can this be changed?
Reason is - because Custom Field Names are used on document templates, we tend to keep these abbreviated or shorter, so as not to clog up the template with extra long names, whereas the Label is the proper refined name that users know the field by.
If the report can use the Labels rather than the Names, this would help with report readabilty. This would need to be "on-screen" and in exported reports.
Thanks
Nick
0 Votes
1 Comments
Nick Ciccocioppo posted 12 months ago
To add to this, it would be nice if the reports could have a header row with all the fields labelled in the actual report (for the on-screen reports), rather than having to look at the pivot fields which end up out of alignment with the report column data.
0 Votes
Login or Sign up to post a comment